Wikileaks came through after all. And while there might not be a smoking gun, there is some there there. At the very least, we have a more complex picture of Hillary Clinton and some of the people surrounding her.
The “money shot”—and the quote that will be endlessly repeated by Alex Jones—is the revelation that Hillary is a “hemispherist.”
My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders, some time in the future with energy that is as green and sustainable as we can get it, powering growth and opportunity for every person in the hemisphere.
While there’s more than a whiff of “NWO conspiracy” to lines like this, they are pretty standard fair for bankers, corporate tycoons, and political shills who wax on about saving the world over Glühwein in Davos.
It also demonstrates the role that nation-states have been playing for decades now: they are not really about “democracy” so much as facilitating the development of regional and global economic structures.
Hillary must thus play the “double game” of appearing as a kindly grandmother, who worries about income inequality and “working families,” while pursuing a grander vision.
And thus we have. . .
Clinton: But If Everybody’s Watching, You Know, All Of The Back Room Discussions And The Deals, You Know, Then People Get A Little Nervous, To Say The Least. So, You Need Both A Public And A Private Position.”
Clinton: You just have to sort of figure out how to — getting back to that word, “balance” — how to balance the public and the private efforts that are necessary to be successful, politically, and that’s not just a comment about today. That, I think, has probably been true for all of our history. . .
It’s easy to express moral outrage at Hillary’s patent hypocrisy. But the fact is, every politician—especially ones operating in democratic elections that are effectively endless, totalitarian reality shows—must behave in this manner to a great extent. I would actually be worried about a politician who didn’t know the rules of the game. The whole point of political action is to bridge idealism with pragmatism.
The Alt Right should have “dreams”—dreams that might very well not “play in Peoria,” that is, that might not be sellable to average people at the moment. Trump has been a watershed, because he has been a popular politician—the kind of man who speaks the language of average people—but onto whom we have projected dreams.
In other news, many of us have had a long-standing debate over whether liberals really believe their own bullshit—i.e., whether liberals truly believe that all races are equal—or whether they simply use liberalism, cynically, as a tactic for manipulating the public and remaining on top in a chaotic multi-racial world.
To this ongoing debate, I add the email stylings of a one “email@example.com,” who combined an anti-German (and most likely Jewish-derived) bigotry with a bit of Sailer-esque race realism.
Subject: What’s the difference between a German and a shopping cart? A shopping cart has got a mind of its own
Germany’s energy policy manages to harm the environment and cripple the German economy at the same time……….. That’s yet another example of German gawd-awful Gutmenscherei, more aptly described as Vollidioterei – which is set to do more ever-lasting damage to the whole of Europe than all other previous German extremist ideologies combined. Normally, I would look for corroborating evidence in the local media, but the only thing you can learn from the German press is that there are 50 ways to tell a ludicrous lie about Mama Merkel & her Multikulti Morass.
Among the multitudes of MSM falsehoods rammed down the throats of German brainwasheables, the German media are arguing that the many millions of new arrivals will somehow replenish Germany’s graying and shrinking labor force. Never mind that all available figures show that the vast majority of working-age Muslims in Euroweenieland are not only jobless, but also structurally unemployable (completely lacking in all marketable skills). The frightening future of German schmeducation can be best seen in a clip giving an impression of your average Mickey Mouse vocational school, which aims to turn Muslim kids into semi-employables at the lowest possible level and fails miserably across the board. . .
It’s no brain surgery, but the media have long failed to provide a clear credible answer. They are unable to come up with an answer or don’t like the answer that’s staring them in the face. The main reason behind successful immigration should be painfully obvious to even the most dimwitted of observers: Some groups of people are almost always highly successful given only half a chance (Jews, Hindus/Sikhs and Chinese people, for example), while others (Muslims, blacks and Roma, for instance) fare badly almost irrespective of circumstances. The biggest group of humanity can be found somewhere between those two extremes – the perennial overachievers and the professional never-do-wells.
Does the fact that they get HBD make it better or worse?